IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v48y2016i04p430-449_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare Analysis Of The U.S.-Mexican Tomato Suspension Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • KOSSE, ELIJAH
  • DEVADOSS, STEPHEN

Abstract

This study develops a three-county trade model of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to analyze the effects of the 2013 Suspension Agreement on prices, production, consumption, trade flows, and welfare in each country. Although only the United States and Mexico are signatories to the agreement, Canada was also included because the U.S. minimum price distorts prices across the region. Three tomato categories—field, greenhouse, and cherry and grape—are studied because each has a distinct minimum price. The overall welfare effects are positive for Mexico and Canada, but negative for the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosse, Elijah & Devadoss, Stephen, 2016. "Welfare Analysis Of The U.S.-Mexican Tomato Suspension Agreement," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 430-449, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:48:y:2016:i:04:p:430-449_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1074070816000262/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin A. Carter & Tina L. Saitone & K. Aleks Schaefer, 2019. "Managed trade: The US–Mexico sugar suspension agreements," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 1195-1222, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:48:y:2016:i:04:p:430-449_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.