IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v15y2022i2p259-272_18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public

Author

Listed:
  • Rogelberg, Steven G.
  • King, Eden B.
  • Alonso, Alexander

Abstract

It is our contention that industrial-organizational (I-O) science can do many great things for the world of work, but we must first get it out there more readily and fully into the hands of decision makers, policy makers, and the public. This focal article addresses the following topics: (a) Why isn’t I-O science reaching the public? (b) What are good mechanisms to bring I-O science to the public? (c) What are some keys to translation and public consumption? Specific public-facing activities discussed include writing a trade book, writing for trade magazines (e.g., Harvard Business Review [HBR]) and online blogs (e.g., Fortune), leveraging social media (e.g., LinkedIn), submitting op-eds, doing podcasts as a producer and/or guest, and joining a speakers bureau. We also discuss barriers to these activities such as time, reward structures, and skill deficits.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogelberg, Steven G. & King, Eden B. & Alonso, Alexander, 2022. "How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 259-272, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:259-272_18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942621001425/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:259-272_18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.