IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v15y2022i2p151-171_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online I-O graduate education: Where are we and where should we go?

Author

Listed:
  • Kraiger, Kurt
  • Fisher, Sandra
  • Grossman, Rebecca
  • Mills, Maura J.
  • Sitzmann, Traci

Abstract

As online graduate programs in psychology continue to proliferate, it is important to understand the research addressing the effectiveness of online graduate education so as to advise stakeholders in these programs: applicants, students, faculty, and institutions. In this article, we examine the effectiveness of online education in psychology at two levels of analysis. First, we examine empirical evidence at the course level: Do online, hybrid, and face-to-face instruction lead to different effects at the level of course outcomes? Second, we examine empirical evidence at the program level: Do online and face-to-face graduate programs provide different academic experiences for their respective students, and how does program type influence the employability of graduates? We supplement these discussions with results from a survey of faculty who converted graduate courses to online delivery methods during the COVID-19 pandemic in spring of 2020. Finally, we provide practical considerations for administrators, educators, students, and applicant stakeholders of online programs. We also offer suggestions for optimizing learning and development in online environments. Our intent is to stimulate discussion on building effective learning environments and continuing to educate optimally effective industrial-organizational psychologists, regardless of delivery modality.

Suggested Citation

  • Kraiger, Kurt & Fisher, Sandra & Grossman, Rebecca & Mills, Maura J. & Sitzmann, Traci, 2022. "Online I-O graduate education: Where are we and where should we go?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 151-171, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:151-171_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942621001449/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:151-171_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.