IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/hecopl/v13y2018i02p107-117_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a ‘hostile environment for migrants’: the British government’s use of health service data to restrict immigration is a very bad idea

Author

Listed:
  • Hiam, Lucinda
  • Steele, Sarah
  • McKee, Martin

Abstract

In January 2017, the UK Government made public a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Department of Health, National Health Service (NHS) Digital and the Home Office. This Memorandum allows for the more expedited sharing of a patient’s non-clinical data, specifically from the NHS England to the Home Office. The Government justified the MoU as in the ‘public interest to support effective immigration enforcement’. In this review, we seek to unpack this justification by providing, first, a background to the MoU, placing it in the context of creating a ‘hostile environment’ for migrants – a project initially sought by Theresa May in her time as Home Secretary. We then explore the potential impact of data sharing on individual health, public health and on health professionals. We conclude that the MoU could threaten both individual and public health, while placing health professionals in an unworkable position both practically and in terms of their duties to patients around confidentiality. As such, we agree with colleagues’ position that it should be suspended, at least until a full consultation and health impact assessment can be carried out.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiam, Lucinda & Steele, Sarah & McKee, Martin, 2018. "Creating a ‘hostile environment for migrants’: the British government’s use of health service data to restrict immigration is a very bad idea," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 107-117, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:13:y:2018:i:02:p:107-117_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744133117000251/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:hecopl:v:13:y:2018:i:02:p:107-117_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/hep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.