IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/fihrev/v26y2019i01p43-62_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outside lending in the New York City call loan market: evidence from the Panic of 1907

Author

Listed:
  • Moen, Jon
  • Tallman, Ellis

Abstract

Before the Panic of 1907 the large New York City banks were able to maintain the call loan market's liquidity during panics, but the rise in outside lending by trust companies and interior banks in the decade leading up the panic weakened the influence of the large banks. Creating a reliable source of liquidity and reserves external to the financial market like a central bank became obvious after the panic. In the call loan market, like the REPO market in 2008, lack of information on the identity of lenders and volume of the market hindered attempts to stop panic-related depositor withdrawals. Our new estimates of who was participating in the call loan market reveal that it did not contract after 1907; while the trust companies became less important, the New York national banks and outside lenders more than made up the difference.

Suggested Citation

  • Moen, Jon & Tallman, Ellis, 2019. "Outside lending in the New York City call loan market: evidence from the Panic of 1907," Financial History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 43-62, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:fihrev:v:26:y:2019:i:01:p:43-62_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S096856501800015X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard McSherry & Berry K. Wilson, 2020. "Margin practices and requirements during the National Banking Era: An early example of macro‐prudential regulation," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(S1), pages 210-225, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:fihrev:v:26:y:2019:i:01:p:43-62_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/fhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.