IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v22y2014is1ps163-s179_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Idea of Economic Laws. Some Considerations on Rationality, Historicity, and Objectivity in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Horvath, Michael
  • von Weizsäcker, Robert K.

Abstract

The debate on the existence of laws in individual and social behaviour dates back to the very beginnings of economics as a modern science. In adopting the concept of natural laws from classical mechanics, economics originally evolved as ‘social physics.’ But is it really appropriate to transfer the idea of precise and accurate laws to social life and social science? We attempt to answer this question by scrutinizing the methodological foundations of the discipline. In particular, this paper addresses the concepts of rationality, historicity, and objectivity – all located at the very heart of economics and all essential in developing a viable, empirically corroborated theory to face and embrace economic complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Horvath, Michael & von Weizsäcker, Robert K., 2014. "The Idea of Economic Laws. Some Considerations on Rationality, Historicity, and Objectivity in Economics," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(S1), pages 163-179, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:22:y:2014:i:s1:p:s163-s179_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1062798713000823/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:22:y:2014:i:s1:p:s163-s179_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.