IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v18y2010i02p263-268_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Biologic Stability of the Industrial Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Danielmeyer, H.G.
  • Martinetz, Thomas

Abstract

We compare G7 life expectancies with the existential conditions from 1870 to date, using the real annual outputs of goods and services per capita as a measure of existential conditions. Wars destroy analytic relations, but life insurers eliminate catastrophic losses, and the outputs have an envelope representing the undisturbed existential condition. Both evolutions are S-functions with the same growth parameter of 62 years. Its length bridging three generations and its constancy over two orders of magnitude in output implies biologic pace control. For the first time it is seen that the mean life expectancy precedes the existential condition by a constant 59 years and approaches asymptotically an age of 118. This precedence and the ratio of 2 follow quantitatively from life’s integration over the existential condition. On the conditions of stable environment and openness to new knowledge, the industrial evolution will continue as a stable predictable process, immune to world wars and financial breakdowns.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielmeyer, H.G. & Martinetz, Thomas, 2010. "The Biologic Stability of the Industrial Evolution," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 263-268, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:18:y:2010:i:02:p:263-268_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S106279870999041X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans G. Danielmeyer & Thomas Martinetz, 2012. "A physical theory of economic growth," Papers 1206.2494, arXiv.org.
    2. Hans G. Danielmeyer & Thomas Martinetz, 2012. "Predicting economic growth with classical physics and human biology," Papers 1212.1286, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:18:y:2010:i:02:p:263-268_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.