IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/eurrev/v18y2010i02p207-225_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Hyphen of National Culture. The Paradox of National Distinctiveness in Belgium and the Netherlands, 1860–1918

Author

Listed:
  • Tollebeek, Jo

Abstract

At the turn of the 20th century, intellectuals and artists in Belgium and the Netherlands were keen to define their respective national identities. One of the most striking ways of doing this was based on a paradox: in both Belgium and the Netherlands the idea came into being that their national distinctiveness actually lay in their being international. What set the Belgians, living in the heart of Europe, apart from the French or the Germans, so the thinking went, was precisely the fact that they were able to understand both the French and the Germans. And what made the Dutch different from the inhabitants of the major powers, it was emphasised, was the fact that they were attentive to the general interest, and not just their own national interest. This article focuses on the history of this remarkable ‘international patriotism’.

Suggested Citation

  • Tollebeek, Jo, 2010. "The Hyphen of National Culture. The Paradox of National Distinctiveness in Belgium and the Netherlands, 1860–1918," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 207-225, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:18:y:2010:i:02:p:207-225_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S106279870999024X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:eurrev:v:18:y:2010:i:02:p:207-225_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/erw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.