IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v38y2022i3p536-561_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test For Zero Median Of Errors In An Arma–Garch Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Yaolan
  • Zhou, Mo
  • Peng, Liang
  • Zhang, Rongmao

Abstract

Because the ARMA–GARCH model can generate data with some important properties such as skewness, heavy tails, and volatility persistence, it has become a benchmark model in analyzing financial and economic data. The commonly employed quasi maximum likelihood estimation (QMLE) requires a finite fourth moment for both errors and the sequence itself to ensure a normal limit. The self-weighted quasi maximum exponential likelihood estimation (SWQMELE) reduces the moment constraints by assuming that the errors and their absolute values have median zero and mean one, respectively. Therefore, it is necessary to test zero median of errors before applying the SWQMELE, as changing zero mean to zero median destroys the ARMA–GARCH structure. This paper develops an efficient empirical likelihood test without estimating the GARCH model but using the GARCH structure to reduce the moment effect. A simulation study confirms the effectiveness of the proposed test. The data analysis shows that some financial returns do not have zero median of errors, which cautions the use of the SWQMELE.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Yaolan & Zhou, Mo & Peng, Liang & Zhang, Rongmao, 2022. "Test For Zero Median Of Errors In An Arma–Garch Model," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 536-561, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:38:y:2022:i:3:p:536-561_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466621000244/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:38:y:2022:i:3:p:536-561_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.