IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v36y2020i3p526-558_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large System Of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions: A Penalized Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Qingliang
  • Han, Xiao
  • Pan, Guangming
  • Jiang, Bibo

Abstract

In this article, using a shrinkage estimator, we propose a penalized quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (PQMLE) to estimate a large system of equations in seemingly unrelated regression models, where the number of equations is large relative to the sample size. We develop the asymptotic properties of the PQMLE for both the error covariance matrix and model coefficients. In particular, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the coefficient estimator and the convergence rate of the estimated covariance matrix in terms of the Frobenius norm. The model selection consistency of the covariance matrix estimator is also established. Simulation results show that when the number of equations is large relative to the sample size and the error covariance matrix is sparse, the PQMLE outperforms other contemporary estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Qingliang & Han, Xiao & Pan, Guangming & Jiang, Bibo, 2020. "Large System Of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions: A Penalized Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation Perspective," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 526-558, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:36:y:2020:i:3:p:526-558_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S026646661900015X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Kiryoung & Joen, Yoontae & Kim, Minki, 2022. "Which uncertainty measures matter for the cross-section of stock returns?#," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:36:y:2020:i:3:p:526-558_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.