IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v13y2012i04p862-897_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Asbestos Litigation Master Narrative: Building Codes, Engineering Standards, and “Retroactive Inculpationâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Maines, Rachel

Abstract

“Asbestos litigation is a quintessential example of the expansion of the scope of liability by retroactive inculpation†—Lester Brickman, Lawyer Barons (Cambridge University Press, 2011, 154).Sociologist of science Sheila Jasanoff tells us that “A master narrative is a compelling and frequently repeated story about the way the world works that takes hold of our imaginations and shapes the ways in which we perceive reality, as well as our possibilities for collective action.†The asbestos litigation master narrative, versions of which are available on hundreds of plaintiff-firm websites, has been spectacularly successful in generating billions of dollars in revenue for plaintiffs, attorneys, and expert witnesses since 1973.2 As of December 31, 2009, the US District Court E.D. Pa. MDL 875 (Multi-District asbestos Litigation) docket included 42,076 cases “consisting of 2,337,692 individual claims (all diseases).â€

Suggested Citation

  • Maines, Rachel, 2012. "The Asbestos Litigation Master Narrative: Building Codes, Engineering Standards, and “Retroactive Inculpationâ€," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 862-897, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:13:y:2012:i:04:p:862-897_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1467222700011496/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:13:y:2012:i:04:p:862-897_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.