IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v2y1997i02p195-221_22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation?

Author

Listed:
  • ARROW, KENNETH J.
  • CROPPER, MAUREEN L.
  • EADS, GEORGE C.
  • HAHN, ROBERT W.
  • LAVE, LESTER B.
  • NOLL, ROGER G.
  • PORTNEY, PAUL R.
  • RUSSELL, MILSON
  • SCHMALENSEE, RICHARD
  • SMITH, V. KERRY
  • STAVINS, ROBERT N.

Abstract

The growing impact of regulations on the economy has led both Congress and the Administration to search for new ways of reforming the regulatory process. Many of these initiatives call for greater reliance on the use of economic analysis in the development and evaluation of regulations. One specific approach being advocated is benefit-cost analysis, an economic tool for comparing the desirable and undesirable impacts of proposed policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. & Cropper, Maureen L. & Eads, George C. & Hahn, Robert W. & Lave, Lester B. & Noll, Roger G. & Portney, Paul R. & Russell, Milson & Schmalensee, Richard & Smith, V. Kerry & Stavins, , 1997. "Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 195-221, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:2:y:1997:i:02:p:195-221_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X97220164/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:2:y:1997:i:02:p:195-221_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.