IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v6y1990i01p153-155_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Inefficiency of Some Efficiency Comparisons: A Reply to Nye

Author

Listed:
  • Saraydar, Edward

Abstract

John Nye (1990) feels that one of my two brief specific references to his (1987) work “leaves the impression that my work downplays the problems of individual differences in taste or social institutions by dismissing them out of hand†(Nye, 1990, p. 148). Let me assure him that he is unduly alarmed, since virtually all readers will read into the passage that he quotes only what I intended and, indeed, what Nye himself intended - that if he or anyone else had found evidence that firm size mattered for productivity, this would be taken as evidence of inefficiency. This is especially clear because in the previous paragraph I (selectively, I suppose) took note of Nye's own review of the extensive literature that argues that “less productive and, therefore, ‘inefficient’ family firms led to French ‘backwardness’ in production†(Saraydar, 1989, p. 55).

Suggested Citation

  • Saraydar, Edward, 1990. "The Inefficiency of Some Efficiency Comparisons: A Reply to Nye," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 153-155, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:6:y:1990:i:01:p:153-155_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266267100000705/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:6:y:1990:i:01:p:153-155_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.