IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v34y2018i03p477-482_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response To Our Commentators On The Report Of The International Panel On Social Progress 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Adler, Matthew
  • Fleurbaey, Marc

Abstract

The contributors to this symposium have brought up many important points in their discussions of five chapters of the Report, and we are very grateful to them. Since the authors of the chapters would be better able to respond to many of the specific comments, we will confine ourselves here to a brief discussion of a few major issues highlighted by the contributors. We are in particular inspired by the following comments: Alina Rocha Menocal's point about the role of the state and committed elites; James Deane's description of the deep transformation of the media scene by new forms of communication; Uma Rani's emphasis on the importance of structural transformation and social care policies; and Diana Alarcon's call for paying greater attention to different levels of development and to macroeconomic policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Adler, Matthew & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2018. "Response To Our Commentators On The Report Of The International Panel On Social Progress 2018," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 477-482, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:34:y:2018:i:03:p:477-482_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266267118000421/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:34:y:2018:i:03:p:477-482_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.