IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/ecnphi/v2y1986i02p197-224_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plausibility in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Nooteboom, Bart

Abstract

According to the instrumentalism of Friedman (1970) and Machlup (1967) it is irrelevant whether the explanatory principles or “assumptions†of a theory satisfy any criterion of “plausibility,†“realism,†“credibility,†or “soundness.†In this view the main or only criterion for selecting theories is whether a theory yields empirically testable implications that turn out to be consistent with observations. All we should require or expect from a theory is that it is a useful instrument for the purpose of prediction. Considerations of the “efficiency†of a theory for the purpose of ordering our experiences are permitted (Friedman), but considerations of “plausibility†are not (Friedman and Machlup). “Explanatory assumptions†are not really explanatory in the sense that they claim to represent underlying causal processes in reality; they only serve to generate, by deduction, implications that are in accordance with as many observations as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Nooteboom, Bart, 1986. "Plausibility in Economics," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 197-224, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:2:y:1986:i:02:p:197-224_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1478061500002632/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arjo Klamer, 2002. "Making sense of economists: from falsification to rhetoric and beyond," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 69-75.
    2. Pascha, Werner & Storz, Cornelia, 2008. "How are markets created? The case of Japan's silver market," Working Papers on East Asian Studies 78/2008, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST.
    3. Andreas Pyka & Bernd Ebersberger & Horst Hanusch, 2004. "A Conceptual Framework to Model Long-run Qualitative Change in the Energy System," Chapters, in: J. Stanley Metcalfe & John Foster (ed.), Evolution and Economic Complexity, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. De Geest, Gerrit, 1996. "The debate on the scientific status of law & economics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 999-1006, April.
    5. Bart Nooteboom, 2014. "How Markets Work and Fail, and What to Make of Them," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15917.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:ecnphi:v:2:y:1986:i:02:p:197-224_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.