IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buspol/v24y2022i2p113-132_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inoculating the University R&D Enterprise: How RISC can strengthen post-COVID-19 research integrity and global supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Norris, William J.
  • Vaughan-Naron, Katie
  • Kashyap, Neha
  • Rodgers, Joseph Balmain

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored emerging vulnerabilities in the US research and development (R&D) ecosystem. While an open and collaborative environment has been essential for advancing R&D, this approach exposes university-based R&D to a variety of security threats including state-supported efforts, attacks by malicious actors, and insufficient internal mitigation. As the pandemic led to more remote work and online collaboration, the incidence of exploitation has expanded. Increased security measures are needed to insulate and protect the R&D ecosystem, and US innovation more broadly, while maintaining the fundamental qualities that have contributed to its historical success. In this article, we present the Research Integrity Security Certification (RISC) framework. This concept preserves the autonomy of the US higher education system while also suggesting a mechanism whose effect would be a general enhancement of the security of the US university R&D enterprise with minimal additional state involvement. Much of the work in the proposed model is done by market mechanisms and self-interested microeconomic calculations that generate beneficial aggregate effects. The RISC framework modernizes the university R&D enterprise while strengthening it to operate in this evolving security environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Norris, William J. & Vaughan-Naron, Katie & Kashyap, Neha & Rodgers, Joseph Balmain, 2022. "Inoculating the University R&D Enterprise: How RISC can strengthen post-COVID-19 research integrity and global supply chains," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 113-132, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:113-132_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1469356922000027/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buspol:v:24:y:2022:i:2:p:113-132_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.