IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v6y2021i2p179-197_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten Years After: From UN Guiding Principles to Multi-Fiduciary Obligations

Author

Listed:
  • RUGGIE, John Gerard
  • REES, Caroline
  • DAVIS, Rachel

Abstract

For the first time in four decades, leading business associations, corporations, and the corporate law and governance community are seriously debating moving beyond shareholder primacy toward some form of ‘stakeholder governance. But the how question unveils significant differences of opinion as well as difficulties. We focus on a pathway that complements the ambition of stakeholder governance, but which current reform proposals have largely overlooked. We draw on practical experience in the field of business and human rights, where leading companies are increasingly embedding human rights due diligence processes into their strategic decision-making. We contend that as human rights due diligence is made mandatory for companies, which it is in a growing number of jurisdictions, including for foreign firms with a significant business presence in them, risks to stakeholders become a material corporate governance issue. That makes it necessary for firms to address stakeholder concerns and to demonstrate that they are, with possible legal consequences for having failed to do where harm occurs. Such changes by themselves may not constitute a full-blown system of multi-fiduciary obligations, but they mark substantial strides on the path toward it, and they are doing it in the relatively near-term.

Suggested Citation

  • RUGGIE, John Gerard & REES, Caroline & DAVIS, Rachel, 2021. "Ten Years After: From UN Guiding Principles to Multi-Fiduciary Obligations," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 179-197, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:179-197_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019821000080/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claire Bright & Karin Buhmann, 2021. "Risk-Based Due Diligence, Climate Change, Human Rights and the Just Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Stephen J. Turner, 2021. "Business, Human Rights and the Environment—Using Macro Legal Analysis to Develop a Legal Framework That Coherently Addresses the Root Causes of Corporate Human Rights Violations and Environmental Degr," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-31, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:6:y:2021:i:2:p:179-197_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.