IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v76y2002i03p435-478_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control, Performance, and Knowledge Transfers in Large Multinationals: Unilever in the United States, 1945–1980

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Geoffrey

Abstract

This article considers key issues relating to the organization and performance of large multinational firms in the post-Second World War period. Although foreign direct investment is defined by ownership and control, in practice the nature of that “control†is far from straightforward. The issue of control is examined, as is the related question of the “stickiness†of knowledge within large international firms. The discussion draws on a case study of the Anglo-Dutch consumer goods manufacturer Unilever, which has been one of the largest direct investors in the United States in the twentieth century. After 1945 Unilever's once successful business in the United States began to decline, yet the parent company maintained an arms-length relationship with its U.S. affiliates, refusing to intervene in their management. Although Unilever “owned†large U.S. businesses, the question of whether it “controlled†them was more debatable.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Geoffrey, 2002. "Control, Performance, and Knowledge Transfers in Large Multinationals: Unilever in the United States, 1945–1980," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 435-478, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:76:y:2002:i:03:p:435-478_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680500000118/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-François Hennart, 2007. "The theoretical rationale for a multinationality-performance relationship," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 423-452, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:76:y:2002:i:03:p:435-478_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.