IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v73y1999i04p577-600_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Nature of the Firm: Towards an Ecocultural History of Business

Author

Listed:
  • Rosen, Christine Meisner
  • Sellers, Christopher C.

Abstract

Business history has never paid much attention to the environment. Brushing aside the firm's reliance and impact on the natural world, early business historians zeroed in on the role of the entrepreneur in big business's rise. They found it easy to truncate, marginalize or altogether ignore the physical processes by which the stuff of nature—“raw†materials—was carved or coaxed out of mountains, forests, and deserts, channeled into factories and squeezed and cajoled into commodities. They scarcely considered the ever-changing varieties of “waste†generated by businesses and customers, which so often infiltrated, polluted, and otherwise altered the world beyond factory and office. They devoted equally little attention to the effects of resource extraction and use on plants, animals, land, air, or water, much less entire ecosystems and climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosen, Christine Meisner & Sellers, Christopher C., 1999. "The Nature of the Firm: Towards an Ecocultural History of Business," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(4), pages 577-600, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:73:y:1999:i:04:p:577-600_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680500062437/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:fan:istois:v:html10.3280/isto2022-045001 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Christine Meisner Rosen, 2012. "Fact Versus Conjecture in the History of Industrial Waste Utilization," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 9(2), pages 112-121, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:73:y:1999:i:04:p:577-600_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.