IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v71y1997i03p381-416_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paternalism and Pink Collars: Gender and Federal Employee Relations, 1941–50

Author

Listed:
  • Rung, Margaret C.

Abstract

Women substantially increased their presence in Washington, D.C.'s federal civil service during World War II. Accordingly, agency administrators struggled to define and address the “needs†of these new government women. This article analyzes the crucial role that gender played in the renegotiation of management strategies and policies during the 1940s. It examines the popularization of the human relations school of management in federal agencies and reveals how gendered concepts of authority impacted the employment prospects of female civil servants. The war provided an opportunity for some managers to promote a more “feminine†interpretation of human relations, but as this article demonstrates, that interpretation rested upon stressing the difference between male and female workers. In addition, postwar conservatism allowed for a reassertion of more hierarchical, “masculine†approaches to employment management in the civil service.

Suggested Citation

  • Rung, Margaret C., 1997. "Paternalism and Pink Collars: Gender and Federal Employee Relations, 1941–50," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 381-416, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:71:y:1997:i:03:p:381-416_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680500034620/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:71:y:1997:i:03:p:381-416_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.