IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhirw/v64y1990i04p630-656_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“A Triumph in Modern Philanthropy†: Age Criteria in Labor Management at the Pennsylvania Railroad, 1875–1930

Author

Listed:
  • Gratton, Brian

Abstract

Labor policies based on age have been variously explained as benevolent, maliciously anti-union, rational, or prejudicial. Nineteenth-century devices to stabilize the work force set the stage for the Pennsylvania Railroad's 1900 program of age limits, mandatory retirement, and pensions, but its immediate cause was the conviction that the seniority system already in place seriously reduced the efficiency of older workers. As the following article shows, this economic calculation remained appealing to some executives in the twentieth century, even as the actual costs of pensions became painfully apparent. For others, the old fear of workers' unrest reappeared as a justification for ignoring the impending crisis of the 1930s.

Suggested Citation

  • Gratton, Brian, 1990. "“A Triumph in Modern Philanthropy†: Age Criteria in Labor Management at the Pennsylvania Railroad, 1875–1930," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(4), pages 630-656, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:64:y:1990:i:04:p:630-656_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007680500059006/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhirw:v:64:y:1990:i:04:p:630-656_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.