IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v5y1999i01p197-236_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Parametric Likelihood Enhancements to Parametric Graduations

Author

Listed:
  • Thomson, R.J.

Abstract

Parametric graduation may fail to achieve satisfactory results without overparameterisation. Whittaker-Henderson graduation tends to constrain the graduated values towards a low-order polynomial. Non-parametric methods do not generally make direct use of true likelihood functions. This paper suggests a method of enhancing the likelihood of a parametric graduation by means of non-parametric methods, thus reducing the disadvantages of both methods. The parametric graduation is taken to be ideally smooth by definition and is adjusted by using constrained maximum likelihood estimation to obtain better fidelity to the experience. The constraint imposes a minimum sacrifice of smoothness, in terms of a quantitative smoothness criterion, from the initial ideal. The method is not entirely objective in that, in some cases, professional judgement is required in order to assess the degree of smoothness that can be imposed. In other cases the method provides an objective optimum. In either case, by quantifying the degrees of departure from perfect fidelity and from ideal smoothness, the suggested method provides useful and theoretically sound criteria for the purposes of the optimisation process. In particular, by inverting the parametric graduation formula for the purposes of defining the smoothness criterion, the method ensures that the smoothness criterion is consistent over the whole age range, thus resolving the main objection to non-parametric graduation. The method is applied to the 1979-82 experience for life office pensioners in the United Kingdom with positive results.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomson, R.J., 1999. "Non-Parametric Likelihood Enhancements to Parametric Graduations," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 197-236, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:5:y:1999:i:01:p:197-236_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321700000428/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:5:y:1999:i:01:p:197-236_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.