IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v3y1997i4p785-834_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Education and Continuing Professional Development Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

This report outlines proposals for the development of the Education and CPD strategy of the profession. The first part of the report gives an introduction to the key issues which have been considered in developing the strategy. The main part of the report describes the proposed model and the rationale behind various aspects of the proposed model. In particular, there is a commentary on how key issues have been addressed. The report has been discussed at a joint meeting of both Councils, and has received support for further development along the broad lines indicated. The key emphasis is on evolution from our present strategy. The report is now being issued for wider discussion by the profession. Comments are particularly sought on the following issues: (1) Is it necessary to specifically assess detailed country-specific legislation and regulation in any subject prior to Fellowship, or is it appropriate to assess this at Stage 3 through the problem solving activity as proposed in the paper? (2) How useful will it be to members to seek intermediate qualifications from the Privy Council? (3) Should the profession look to increasing the range of assessment methods used? (4) The Fellowship qualification is defined as the level of an embryo actuary. How do we encourage actuaries to gain enhanced skills during the CPD stage? (5) Is the approach to specialisation appropriate?

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 1997. "Development of Education and Continuing Professional Development Strategy," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 785-834, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:3:y:1997:i:4:p:785-834_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321700005158/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:3:y:1997:i:4:p:785-834_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.