IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v29y2024ip-_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Report of the target end-states for defined benefit pension schemes working party

Author

Listed:
  • Aponte, A.
  • Caleechurn, D.
  • Jones, N.
  • Kola, J.
  • Littlewood, R.
  • Mikulskis, D.
  • Wesbroom, K.
  • Yiasoumi, C. A.

Abstract

Running off the £2 trillion of UK corporate sector defined benefit liabilities in an efficient and effective fashion is the biggest challenge facing the UK pensions industry. As more and more defined benefit pension schemes start maturing, the trustees running those schemes need to consider what their target end-state will be and the associated journey plan. However, too few trustee boards have well-articulated and robust plans. Determining the target end-state requires a grasp of various disciplines and an ability to work collaboratively with different professional advisers. This paper sets out issues trustees, employers and their advisers can consider when addressing whether their target end state should be low- dependency, buyout or transfer to a superfund. Member outcomes analysis is introduced as a central tool through which to differentiate alternative target end-states. A five-step methodology is set out for deriving an optimal target end-state for a scheme. Also considered are the specific factors impacting stressed schemes, which highlights the importance to trustee boards when considering their Plan B should their employer or scheme ever become stressed. The paper ends with specific recommendations for the actuarial profession and The Pensions Regulator to take forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Aponte, A. & Caleechurn, D. & Jones, N. & Kola, J. & Littlewood, R. & Mikulskis, D. & Wesbroom, K. & Yiasoumi, C. A., 2024. "Report of the target end-states for defined benefit pension schemes working party," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321723000119/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.