IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v24y2019ip-_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of economic scenario generators: a report by the Extreme Events Working Party members

Author

Listed:
  • Jakhria, P.
  • Frankland, R.
  • Sharp, S.
  • Smith, A.
  • Rowe, A.
  • Wilkins, T.

Abstract

Some UK insurers have been using real-world economic scenarios for more than 30 years. Popular approaches have included random walks, time series models, arbitrage-free models with added risk premiums or 1-year Value at Risk distribution fits. Based on interviews with experienced practitioners as well as historical documents and meeting minutes, this paper traces historical model evolution in the United Kingdom and abroad. We examine the possible catalysts for changes in modelling practice with a particular emphasis on regulatory and socio-cultural influences. We apply past lessons to provide some guidance to the direction of capital market modelling in future, which has been key for business and strategy decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakhria, P. & Frankland, R. & Sharp, S. & Smith, A. & Rowe, A. & Wilkins, T., 2019. "Evolution of economic scenario generators: a report by the Extreme Events Working Party members," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:24:y:2019:i::p:-_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321718000181/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmet Akca & Ethem Çanakoğlu, 2021. "Adaptive stochastic risk estimation of firm operating profit," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(3), pages 463-504, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:24:y:2019:i::p:-_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.