IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v22y2017i02p257-335_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-based capital models: testing, justifying and communicating choices. A report from the life aggregation and simulation techniques working party

Author

Listed:
  • Androschuck, T.
  • Gibbs, S.
  • Katrakis, N.
  • Lau, J.
  • Oram, S.
  • Raddall, P.
  • Semchyshyn, L.
  • Stevenson, D.
  • Waters, J.

Abstract

The development of an economic capital model requires a decision to be made regarding how to aggregate capital requirements for the individual risk factors while taking into account the effects of diversification. Under the Individual Capital Adequacy Standards framework, UK life insurers have commonly adopted a correlation matrix approach due to its simplicity and ease in communication to the stakeholders involved, adjusting the result, where appropriate, to allow for non-linear interactions. The regulatory requirements of Solvency II have been one of the principal drivers leading to an increased use of more sophisticated aggregation techniques in economic capital models. This paper focusses on a simulation-based approach to the aggregation of capital requirements using copulas and proxy models. It describes the practical challenges in parameterising a copula including how allowance may be made for tail dependence. It also covers the challenges associated with fitting and validating a proxy model. In particular, the paper outlines how insurers could test, communicate and justify the choices made through the use of some examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Androschuck, T. & Gibbs, S. & Katrakis, N. & Lau, J. & Oram, S. & Raddall, P. & Semchyshyn, L. & Stevenson, D. & Waters, J., 2017. "Simulation-based capital models: testing, justifying and communicating choices. A report from the life aggregation and simulation techniques working party," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 257-335, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:22:y:2017:i:02:p:257-335_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321717000071/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:22:y:2017:i:02:p:257-335_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.