IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v21y2016i02p229-296_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model risk – daring to open up the black box

Author

Listed:
  • Aggarwal, A.
  • Beck, M. B.
  • Cann, M.
  • Ford, T.
  • Georgescu, D.
  • Morjaria, N.
  • Smith, A.
  • Taylor, Y.
  • Tsanakas, A.
  • Witts, L.
  • Ye, I.

Abstract

With the increasing use of complex quantitative models in applications throughout the financial world, model risk has become a major concern. Such risk is generated by the potential inaccuracy and inappropriate use of models in business applications, which can lead to substantial financial losses and reputational damage. In this paper, we deal with the management and measurement of model risk. First, a model risk framework is developed, adapting concepts such as risk appetite, monitoring, and mitigation to the particular case of model risk. The usefulness of such a framework for preventing losses associated with model risk is demonstrated through case studies. Second, we investigate the ways in which different ways of using and perceiving models within an organisation both lead to different model risks. We identify four distinct model cultures and argue that in conditions of deep model uncertainty, each of those cultures makes a valuable contribution to model risk governance. Thus, the space of legitimate challenges to models is expanded, such that, in addition to a technical critique, operational and commercial concerns are also addressed. Third, we discuss through the examples of proxy modelling, longevity risk, and investment advice, common methods and challenges for quantifying model risk. Difficulties arise in mapping model errors to actual financial impact. In the case of irreducible model uncertainty, it is necessary to employ a variety of measurement approaches, based on statistical inference, fitting multiple models, and stress and scenario analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Aggarwal, A. & Beck, M. B. & Cann, M. & Ford, T. & Georgescu, D. & Morjaria, N. & Smith, A. & Taylor, Y. & Tsanakas, A. & Witts, L. & Ye, I., 2016. "Model risk – daring to open up the black box," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 229-296, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:21:y:2016:i:02:p:229-296_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321715000276/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:21:y:2016:i:02:p:229-296_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.