IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v12y2006i3p621-638_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Actuaries make the Best Risk Managers? A Discussion Meeting

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

As part of the Profession's drive to widen the range of careers open to actuaries, a risk management taskforce was established. It put out a statement headed: ‘We're All Risk Managers Now’. Reactions to this varied from: “What do you mean now — actuaries have always been risk managers.†to: “That certainly doesn't include me.†This Sessional Meeting takes the form of an open debate among actuaries from different fields about the role of risk management in their work: Which actuarial fields are most advanced in the area of risk management? Is a change of mindset required to make the most of the opportunities? What about the part played by the actuarial education system? Should actuaries look to broaden their experience at an earlier stage in their careers? The meeting begins with a contribution from a member of the Finance, Investment and Risk Management Board, and from three speakers, with presentations on the subjects of pensions, of life insurance and of general insurance. The discussion which follows gives speakers the chance to say what they think and to help to shape the future strategy of the profession in the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 2006. "Which Actuaries make the Best Risk Managers? A Discussion Meeting," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 621-638, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:621-638_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321700004633/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:12:y:2006:i:3:p:621-638_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.