IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v6y1976i04p401-432_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of Public Expenditure: American Theory and British Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, Rudolf

Abstract

Public expenditure is quite the most visible and quantifiable measure of government activity. It is therefore surprising that in Britain, as distinct from the United States, this area has been massively neglected by political scientists. This neglect is all the odder since public expenditure in Britain – comprehensively and conventionally defined to include all spending by central and local government, as well as capital investment by public corporations – has been increasing rapidly both in absolute terms and as a proportion of the national income: between the early 1960s and the middle 'seventies, it rose from just under two-fifths to almost three-fifths of the Gross National Product. So, in effect, the scope of political decision-making about the distribution of national resources has grown considerably, reflecting the changing balance between the political market and the economic market. The dynamics of this process are highly relevant for an understanding of the British political system.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, Rudolf, 1976. "The Politics of Public Expenditure: American Theory and British Practice," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 401-432, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:6:y:1976:i:04:p:401-432_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712340000082X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jørgen Grønnegård Christensen, 1992. "Hierarchical and Contractual Approaches to Budgetary Reform," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 67-91, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:6:y:1976:i:04:p:401-432_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.