IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v51y2021i4p1685-1704_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Media Freedom: An Item Response Theory Analysis of Existing Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Solis, Jonathan A.
  • Waggoner, Philip D.

Abstract

The media's ability to freely gather and disseminate information remains a critical aspect of democracy. Studies link media freedom to other concepts including human rights, corruption, democratic peace and conflict, natural resource wealth, political knowledge and foreign aid. However, media freedom's many facets make it difficult for any single index to fully capture. To develop a more robust measure, this article treats media freedom as a latent variable and analyzes ten extant indicators by fitting an item response theory model. Utilizing a Bayesian approach, the model generates time-series, cross-sectional data on a bounded, unidimensional scale from 0 to 1 that measures media freedom in 197 countries from 1948 to 2017. After numerous validity checks, the authors utilize their new Media System Freedom data to replicate Egorov, Guriev and Sonin's (2009) analysis of media freedom and natural resource wealth. The findings indicate that the published results do not hold once the more robust measure is included.

Suggested Citation

  • Solis, Jonathan A. & Waggoner, Philip D., 2021. "Measuring Media Freedom: An Item Response Theory Analysis of Existing Indicators," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 1685-1704, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:4:p:1685-1704_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123420000101/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asem Khaleel Kreishan, 2022. "Media in dictatorial regimes: Case study of North Korea, Turkmenistan, and Russia," Eximia Journal, Plus Communication Consulting SRL, vol. 5(1), pages 717-733, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:4:p:1685-1704_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.