IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v51y2021i3p940-962_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keeping Friends Close, But Enemies Closer: Foreign Aid Responses to Natural Disasters

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Cindy
  • Minhas, Shahryar

Abstract

If foreign aid is provided primarily for strategic reasons, as much of the field finds, how can donor generosity following natural disasters be explained? This article addresses this puzzle by building on the literature in three ways. First, it differentiates between three major types of aid: humanitarian, civil society and development. Second, it demonstrates that natural disasters act as an exogenous shock to the strategic calculus that donor countries undertake when making foreign aid allocation decisions. Specifically, the authors argue that donor countries use natural disasters as opportunities to exert influence on strategic opponents through the allocation of humanitarian and civil society aid. However, donors still reserve development aid for strategic allies irrespective of the incidence of natural disasters. Third, the findings are substantiated using a new measure of strategic interest that accounts for the indirect ties states share and the multiple dimensions upon which they interact.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Cindy & Minhas, Shahryar, 2021. "Keeping Friends Close, But Enemies Closer: Foreign Aid Responses to Natural Disasters," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 940-962, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:3:p:940-962_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712341900070X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:3:p:940-962_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.