IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v51y2021i2p827-844_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Morality of School Composition: The Case of Religious Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Clayton, Matthew
  • Mason, Andrew
  • Swift, Adam
  • Wareham, Ruth

Abstract

This article presents a normative framework for the assessment of education policies and applies it to the issue of schools’ selecting their students on the basis of religious criteria. Such policies can be justified, and challenged, on many different grounds; public debate is not conducted in terms adequate to the task. The authors’ main objectives are to supplement with non-consequentialist considerations a recent, consequentialist, approach to the normative assessment of education policy proposed by Brighouse et al. (2016, 2018), and to apply the proposed framework to issues of school composition and selection. They argue, further, that policies allowing schools to select all their students on the basis of their parents’ religious affiliation cannot be justified.

Suggested Citation

  • Clayton, Matthew & Mason, Andrew & Swift, Adam & Wareham, Ruth, 2021. "The Political Morality of School Composition: The Case of Religious Selection," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 827-844, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:2:p:827-844_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123418000649/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:2:p:827-844_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.