IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v49y2019i02p637-659_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Power of Peers: How Transnational Advocacy Networks Shape NGO Strategies on Climate Change

Author

Listed:
  • Hadden, Jennifer
  • Jasny, Lorien

Abstract

What explains variation in the tactical choices of non-governmental organizations (NGOs)? This article uses network autocorrelation models to establish how the tactical choices of climate change NGOs are shaped by their embeddedness in transnational advocacy networks. Specifically, it finds that NGOs are more likely to adopt protest tactics when adjacent organizations – those with whom they have direct ties – have already done so. The choices of equivalent organizations – those that occupy similar relational roles in the network – do not appear to be influential. Qualitative evidence also shows that NGOs are affected by relational pressure from their peers, which alters their perception of costs and benefits. These findings enhance understanding of how networks influence actors’ behavior and offer insights into the relational processes that generate protest in global politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadden, Jennifer & Jasny, Lorien, 2019. "The Power of Peers: How Transnational Advocacy Networks Shape NGO Strategies on Climate Change," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 637-659, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:49:y:2019:i:02:p:637-659_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123416000582/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:49:y:2019:i:02:p:637-659_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.