IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v47y2017i03p545-569_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada, 1867–2011

Author

Listed:
  • Godbout, Jean-François
  • Høyland, Bjørn

Abstract

What explains the development of legislative party voting unity? Evidence from the United States and Britain indicate that partisan sorting, cohort replacement effects, electoral incentives, and agenda control contributed to enhancing party cohesion during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Here, these mechanisms are evaluated by analysing a dataset containing all the recorded votes from the Canadian House of Commons, 1867–2011. Overall, we find that partisan sorting and the government’s ability to control the agenda are central to the consolidation of parties over time. Our results underscore the need to integrate institutional rules and legislative agendas into models of parliamentary voting behaviour and suggest that strict party discipline can lead to the development of a multi-party system in the legislative arena.

Suggested Citation

  • Godbout, Jean-François & Høyland, Bjørn, 2017. "Unity in Diversity? The Development of Political Parties in the Parliament of Canada, 1867–2011," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 545-569, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:47:y:2017:i:03:p:545-569_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123415000368/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:47:y:2017:i:03:p:545-569_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.