IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v33y2003i02p213-231_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Culture of Dependence? The Relationship Between Public Assistance and Public Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • SCHNEIDER, SAUNDRA K.
  • JACOBY, WILLIAM G.

Abstract

In the United States it is widely believed that public assistance may have harmful effects on the social and political orientations of those who receive it. Certain kinds of government support – particularly welfare – may foster a ‘culture of dependence’ comprising values and beliefs that are different from, and perhaps contrary to, the predominant American political culture. We examine the relationship between government assistance and public opinion using survey data taken from the 1992 CPS National Election Study. Our empirical results show that welfare benefits do have some effect on issue attitudes. But recipients of public aid are virtually identical to non-recipients in terms of their core values, reactions to the political system and general beliefs about American society. There is no evidence that a distinctive ‘culture of dependence’ has developed among people who rely on financial support from the federal government.

Suggested Citation

  • Schneider, Saundra K. & Jacoby, William G., 2003. "A Culture of Dependence? The Relationship Between Public Assistance and Public Opinion," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 213-231, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:33:y:2003:i:02:p:213-231_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123403000097/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chack-Kie Wong & Vivian Lou, 2010. "“I Wish to be Self-Reliant”: Aspiration for Self-Reliance, Need and Life Satisfaction, and Exit Dilemma of Welfare Recipients in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 519-534, February.
    2. Andreea-Oana Iacobuță & Mihaela Ifrim, 2020. "Welfare Mentality as a Challenge to European Sustainable Development. What Role for Youth Inclusion and Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Jana Morgan & Nathan J. Kelly, 2010. "Explaining Public Attitudes toward Fighting Inequality in Latin America," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 79-111, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:33:y:2003:i:02:p:213-231_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.