IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v27y1997i01p111-155_23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Women's Political Power on Bureaucratic Output: The Case of Child Support Enforcement

Author

Listed:
  • KEISER, LAEL

Abstract

Who gets what, when and how is affected by the power of different groups in society to affect the political process. Many feminists see increasing women's political representation, via elected office or interest-group involvement, as a necessary condition for improving the status of women. Many studies have examined whether the numerical representation of women translates into legislation or legislative behaviour that seeks to improve the status of women. Although we have evidence that women's legislative representation matters, the passage of legislation is only half of the story in public policy making. After policies are enacted, the bureaucracy must implement them and little research has examined the impact of women's political representation on policy outputs. The question of women's influence on bureaucracies is especially important, because bureaucracies deliver services that have a direct bearing on the status of women. It is an important issue for representative democracy whether women have an influence on the bureaucracies that affect them.Beth Reingold, ‘Concepts of Representation among Female and Male State Legislators’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17 (1992), 509–37; Michelle A. Saint-Germaine, ‘Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature’, Social Science Quarterly, 70 (1989), 956–68; Sue Thomas, ‘The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislatures,’ Western Political Quarterly, 44 (1990), 445–56.

Suggested Citation

  • Keiser, Lael, 1997. "The Influence of Women's Political Power on Bureaucratic Output: The Case of Child Support Enforcement," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 111-155, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:27:y:1997:i:01:p:111-155_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712349723005X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:27:y:1997:i:01:p:111-155_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.