IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v19y1989i01p154-159_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Must Liberals Always Vote for Liberals and Need the More Competent Candidate Always Be Preferred?

Author

Listed:
  • Glazer, Amihai
  • Grofman, Bernard

Abstract

Anthony Downs's model of voter choice is customarily interpreted to mean that each voter chooses the candidate whose positions are closest to the voter's. Actually, however, this is too simple a picture of Downs's views. Downs anticipated ideas of prospective and performance-based retrospective voting. He recognized that voters evaluate candidates in terms of their past performances and expectations about future performance, and may discount issue proximity to a candidate if the candidate is not expected to be able to live up to his campaign promises on the issue in question.

Suggested Citation

  • Glazer, Amihai & Grofman, Bernard, 1989. "Must Liberals Always Vote for Liberals and Need the More Competent Candidate Always Be Preferred?," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 154-159, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:19:y:1989:i:01:p:154-159_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123400005391/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:19:y:1989:i:01:p:154-159_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.