IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v10y1980i04p515-521_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Decomposition of Electoral Bias in a Plurality Election

Author

Listed:
  • Gudgin, G.
  • Taylor, P. J.

Abstract

This paper describes an empirical procedure for analysing the difference between the proportion of votes a major party attracts and the proportion of seats it subsequently wins in a plurality election. This difference will be referred to as the electoral bias with respect to that particular party at the election being analysed:B = S — V, (1)where S is the seat proportion and V the vote proportion gained by the party. This bias is the basic concept underlying much of the debate about electoral reform but curiously it has been an under-researched topic in political science literature. Apart from a small continuing debate over the cubic law of seat proportions and some analyses of Australian and New Zealand elections most attention in election studies has been concerned with determining the proportion of votes rather than the subsequent proportion of seats.

Suggested Citation

  • Gudgin, G. & Taylor, P. J., 1980. "The Decomposition of Electoral Bias in a Plurality Election," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 515-521, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:10:y:1980:i:04:p:515-521_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123400002374/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Gudgin & P.J. Taylor, 1982. "The Myth of Non-Partisan Cartography: Clarifications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 19(4), pages 405-407, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:10:y:1980:i:04:p:515-521_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.