IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v9y1977i1-2p247-256_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Stop Loss Inequality for Compound Poisson Processes with a Unimodal Claimsize Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Verbeek, H. G.

Abstract

The paper considers the problem of finding an upper bound for the Stop loss premium.We will start with a brief sketch of the practical context in which this problem is relevant.If it is reasonable to assume, that the accumulated claims variable of the underlying risk can be represented by a Compound Poisson Process, the following data are needed for fixing the Stop loss premium:— the claims intensity,— the distribution of the claimsizes (jump-size variable).In practical situations it is usually possible to find a reasonable estimate for the claims intensity (expected number of claims in a given period).Generally speaking, however, it is not so easy to get sufficient data on the claimsize distribution. Ordinarily only its mean is known. This deficiency in information can of course be offset by assuming the unknown distribution to be one of the familiar types, such as Exponential, Gamma or Pareto.Stop loss premiums are however very sensitive to variations in the type of claimsize distribution and consequently it can make a lot of difference in the result what particular choice is made.To gain some insight into the consequences of a specific assumption, it is useful to know within what range the premium can move for varying distributional suppositions. This means establishing an upper bound and a lower bound. The lower bound is trivially obtained if the mass of the claimsize distribution is solely concentrated at its mean. The upper bound on the other hand should correspond to the “worst†possible claimsize distribution. This means, that we have to look for a distribution which maximizes the Stop loss premium.

Suggested Citation

  • Verbeek, H. G., 1977. "A Stop Loss Inequality for Compound Poisson Processes with a Unimodal Claimsize Distribution," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1-2), pages 247-256, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:9:y:1977:i:1-2:p:247-256_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036100011557/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:9:y:1977:i:1-2:p:247-256_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.