IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v6y1971i02p73-78_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Astin Colloquium at Randers: Subject A Report

Author

Listed:
  • Segerdahl, Carl-Otto

Abstract

Our discussions today will concern Subject A: Risk Theory, in particular the overall risk involved in operating an insurance concern. 7 papers have been handed in to the Colloquium on this subject.To be quite candid, the referee would like to say that only one of these papers really treats the whole of the topic foreseen, and this is the paper by Mr. Colin M. Stewart (U.K.): The Assessment of Solvency. The other papers treat different special practical sides of the problem as well as general risk theoretical questions. One of the papers, that of Mr. Brichler, could have been attributed to Subject B as well as to Subject A, but it has been decided to take it up for treatment today.Mr. Stewart delivers a lot of interesting points, which, I may say, take into account the solvency aspect as it looks to the supervisory authorities much more than has been done within the ASTIN discussions earlier. This, of course, is very related to the fact that regional as well as Common Market discussions have resulted in or will result in legislative rules for judging the solvency of insurance concerns, which rules will have great practical importance in the future. Mr. Stewart stresses the point that in case of non-life concerns it is the business on the books and its future contracted periods, short time business to be signed before judgment can be practically undertaken, claims reported, claims occurred but not yet reported, as compared with free reserves available that really decide the matter of sovency.

Suggested Citation

  • Segerdahl, Carl-Otto, 1971. "Astin Colloquium at Randers: Subject A Report," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 73-78, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:6:y:1971:i:02:p:73-78_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036100010795/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:6:y:1971:i:02:p:73-78_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.