IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v44y2014i01p127-172_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bifurcation Approach For Attritional And Large Losses In Chain Ladder Calculations

Author

Listed:
  • Riegel, Ulrich

Abstract

We introduce a stochastic model for the development of attritional and large claims in long-tail lines of business and present a corresponding “chain ladder-like†IBNR method which allows the use of claims payment data for attritional and claims incurred data for large losses. We derive formulas for the mean squared error of prediction and apply the method to a German motor third party liability portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Riegel, Ulrich, 2014. "A Bifurcation Approach For Attritional And Large Losses In Chain Ladder Calculations," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 127-172, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:44:y:2014:i:01:p:127-172_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036113000275/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2016. "Collective Loss Reserving with Two Types of Claims in Motor Third Party Liability Insurance," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016029, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Martin Eling & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Recent Research Developments Affecting Nonlife Insurance—The CAS Risk Premium Project 2014 Update," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 20(1), pages 63-77, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:44:y:2014:i:01:p:127-172_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.