IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v12y1981i02p115-131_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical Credibility Theory with Emphasis on Optimal Parameter Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • De Vylder, F.

Abstract

We develop Hachemeister's regression model in credibility theory (without proofs) and indicate how the involved structural parameters can be estimated from the observable variables (with proofs for the simple results and those not yet published).Large families of unbiased estimators are available. From the practical viewpoint this is rather a handicap because it creates the problem to decide what estimators actually to use. In order to fix optimal estimators, we adopt the small-sample criterion of minimum-variance. But in the research for general solutions three kinds of difficulties arise.(i) The calculations become too lengthy.(ii) The optimal estimators depend on some of the parameters to be estimated. (Then we call them pseudo-estimators).(iii) The optimal estimators depend on new structural parameters defined in terms of fourth-order moments.Only a compromise allows to cope with this reality. Situation (iii) creates new estimation problems. They can only be avoided at the cost of the introduction of special assumptions or approximations. Then problem (i) is more or less automatically solved. By an obvious method of successive approximations pseudo-estimators can serve as true estimators. Thus (ii) is no real problem.

Suggested Citation

  • De Vylder, F., 1981. "Practical Credibility Theory with Emphasis on Optimal Parameter Estimation," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 115-131, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:12:y:1981:i:02:p:115-131_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036100007054/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frees, Edward W. & Young, Virginia R. & Luo, Yu, 1999. "A longitudinal data analysis interpretation of credibility models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 229-247, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:12:y:1981:i:02:p:115-131_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.