IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v99y2005i01p145-151_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rousseau on the People as Legislative Gatekeepers, Not Framers

Author

Listed:
  • PUTTERMAN, ETHAN

Abstract

Who drafts the laws in Rousseau's ideal state? According to John T. Scott it is the people alone who execute this function and Rousseau “does not positively argue that commissaires, magistrates, or anyone else has the power to propose laws.†Challenging this view, I argue that the philosopher's varied statements on the subject of lawgiving can be shown to establish merely a right by the people to participate in agenda-setting by others. Rousseau believes that the laws must reflect the will of the people but not necessarily through their physical writing, drafting, or framing of constitutional legislation. More important than popular agenda-setting is the majority's freedom to check those who do draft the laws. Amending my earlier argument that the sovereign is barred from legislating, I reveal how Rousseau's notion of self-legislation as “gatekeeping,†rather than agenda-setting, is central to the political theory and institutions of Du contrat social.

Suggested Citation

  • Putterman, Ethan, 2005. "Rousseau on the People as Legislative Gatekeepers, Not Framers," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(1), pages 145-151, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:99:y:2005:i:01:p:145-151_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055405051555/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:99:y:2005:i:01:p:145-151_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.