IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v96y2002i03p672-673_86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. By Richard Snyder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 268p. $60.00 cloth

Author

Listed:
  • Cook, María Lorena

Abstract

Richard Snyder's well-crafted study substantiates what most political scientists suspected all along: that neoliberal reforms lead to new institutions of market governance, rather than to unregulated markets. Snyder sheds light on this understudied topic by examining the reregulation of the coffee sector by four state governments after the Mexican government dismantled the Instituto Mexicano del Café (INMECAFE), the state-owned enterprise that dominated the coffee industry during the 1970s and 1980s. By the late 1980s, when deregulation began, INMECAFE was providing production supports, price controls, and government-managed marketing channels for nearly 200 thousand small coffee producers. Most of these producers were located among the poorest states in southern Mexico.

Suggested Citation

  • Cook, María Lorena, 2002. "Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. By Richard Snyder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 268p. $60.00 cloth," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(3), pages 672-673, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:96:y:2002:i:03:p:672-673_86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055402860361/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:96:y:2002:i:03:p:672-673_86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.