IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v96y2002i01p257-258_30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sanctions as Economic Statecraft: Theory and Practice. Edited by Steve Chan and A. Cooper Drury. New York: St Martin's, 2000. 258p. $75.00

Author

Listed:
  • Nossal, Kim Richard

Abstract

Edited collections usually have relatively clear provenance. Most often they are brought to life by colleagues who are intrigued by an issue or a question; they then organize a conference (or a collection) around that theme and seek a publisher for the resulting collection. Such works are commonly marked by the putative expectations associated with an edited book: There is an attempt by the editors to present the unifying theme desired (if not demanded) by most university presses and the academic reviewers whose reports determine which way the thumbs go. Usually the editors attempt to herd the cats they have invited to participate—and ask that the contributors address unifying themes or take desired approaches. Even if the cats do no more than tip a ritual bow in the direction of the unifying theme, the editors normally use the introduction and conclusion to craft at least the appearance of unification.

Suggested Citation

  • Nossal, Kim Richard, 2002. "Sanctions as Economic Statecraft: Theory and Practice. Edited by Steve Chan and A. Cooper Drury. New York: St Martin's, 2000. 258p. $75.00," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(1), pages 257-258, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:96:y:2002:i:01:p:257-258_30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055402304349/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:96:y:2002:i:01:p:257-258_30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.