IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v96y2002i01p217-218_38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The U.S. Supreme Court and the Electoral Process. Edited by David K. Ryden. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000. 322p. $65.00 cloth, $23.95 paper. Campaigns and the Court: The U.S. Supreme Court in Presidential Elections. By Donald Grier Stephenson, Jr. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999. 363p. $49.50 cloth, $19.50 paper

Author

Listed:
  • Gates, John B.

Abstract

The controversy surrounding the 2000 U.S. presidential election has already generated major scholarly work and will do so for years to come. Both works reviewed here were written before the historic judicial events surrounding the November election of 2000. Far from irrelevant, each work offers unique insight into the fundamental rules surrounding political conflict and the historical flow of elections with major social and economic change. As such, we learn much about political science and the struggle over the proper analytical lens for understanding politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Gates, John B., 2002. "The U.S. Supreme Court and the Electoral Process. Edited by David K. Ryden. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000. 322p. $65.00 cloth, $23.95 paper. Campaigns and the Court: The U.S. Supre," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(1), pages 217-218, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:96:y:2002:i:01:p:217-218_38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055402384326/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:96:y:2002:i:01:p:217-218_38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.