IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v84y1990i02p439-460_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Expected Utility Theory of Conflict: Measuring Theoretical Progress

Author

Listed:
  • Simowitz, Roslyn
  • Price, Barry L.

Abstract

We examine the “progressivity†of Bruce Bueno de Mesquita's theory of conflict as originally developed in The War Trap and as extended later. Bueno de Mesquita offers the progressivity of the expected utility theory relative to other theories and approaches to conflict as his major defense in responding to critics. Bueno de Mesquita essentially relies on Imre Lakatos' definition of theoretical progress in presenting his argument. A review of the literature addressing the concept of theoretical progress indicates that Bueno de Mesquita's application of Lakatosian criteria is incomplete and that Lakatos' criteria are themselves flawed. We review the philosophy of science literature dealing with theoretical progress or rational criteria for theory choice and evaluate the progressivity of the expected utility theory of conflict in light of criteria other than Lakatos'. While we do recommend further elaboration of Bueno de Mesquita's theory, we do not find it more progressive than its rivals.

Suggested Citation

  • Simowitz, Roslyn & Price, Barry L., 1990. "The Expected Utility Theory of Conflict: Measuring Theoretical Progress," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(2), pages 439-460, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:84:y:1990:i:02:p:439-460_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400192585/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick James, 1998. "Rational Choice? Crisis Bargaining Over the Meech Lake Accord," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 16(2), pages 149-184, September.
    2. John Gerring, 2005. "Causation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 17(2), pages 163-198, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:84:y:1990:i:02:p:439-460_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.