IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v73y1979i01p139-154_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Good, the Beautiful, and the Useful: Montaigne's Transvaluation of Values

Author

Listed:
  • Schaefer, David Lewis

Abstract

Historians of political thought have failed to appreciate the importance of Montaigne's Essays as a major work of modern political philosophy. The neglect of the Essays as a political book is traceable to a widespread belief that Montaigne's thought is too fluctuating and unsystematic to embody a coherent and profound political teaching.This study challenges the prevailing interpretation of Montaigne's thought by analyzing his critique of the classical understanding of supreme or “heroic†moral virtue, concentrating especially on the chapter entitled “Of Cruelty.†A careful reading of this chapter reveals that underlying the seeming disunity or inconsistency of its argument is a carefully worked out political intention. The essence of Montaigne's political project involves the replacement of a traditional morality based on “beauty†(i.e., one in which humanity aspires to share in the divine) by one embodying “utility†(one in which we understand our needs in the light of what we share with the beasts). The analysis of this “transvaluation of values†helps one to comprehend the foundations of the “bourgeois†morality that characterizes modern liberal regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Schaefer, David Lewis, 1979. "The Good, the Beautiful, and the Useful: Montaigne's Transvaluation of Values," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 139-154, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:73:y:1979:i:01:p:139-154_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400152657/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:73:y:1979:i:01:p:139-154_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.