IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v70y1976i01p140-148_26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The Divine Science†: Political Engineering in American Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Ranney, Austin

Abstract

The American polity's designers proceeded from what John Adams called “the divine science of politics†—an approach very close to that of modern empirical political science. It was rooted in their conviction that truth is best discovered by the systematic investigation of experience; they investigated experience with methods primitive by modern standards but advanced for the eighteenth century; they applied their findings to the design of political institutions; and they regarded all institutions as experimental, to be revised when experience indicates. This faith in political and social engineering has remained ever since a major element in American political culture. It has recently been shaken by Vietnam, Watergate, and other systemic failures; but it is still far preferable to alternative faiths, especially if we today can cool our rhetoric, moderate our expectations, and recapture the pragmatic, experimental mood of those who created “the divine science.â€

Suggested Citation

  • Ranney, Austin, 1976. "“The Divine Science†: Political Engineering in American Culture," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(1), pages 140-148, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:70:y:1976:i:01:p:140-148_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305540026406X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:70:y:1976:i:01:p:140-148_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.