IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v62y1968i03p916-931_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Attributes as Predictors of Delegate Attitudes at the United Nations1

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent, Jack E.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore United Nations delegate attitudes toward the major organs of the United Nations, i.e., the Security Council, General Assembly, Economic and Social Council, Secretariat, International Court of Justice, and the General and Main Committees of the General Assembly. In respect to these organs, the study probes “delegate satisfactions†concerning voting procedures, membership arrangements, and general role and past performance; “delegate perceptions†in respect to present and future importance and the probability of changes occurring in respect to membership arrangements; and “delegate desires†in respect to modifying roles and powers. The study also attempts to ascertain if delegate attitude patterns can be related to “predictors†generated from attributes of the delegates' home states. That is, is it possible to predict delegate attitudes from information about their home states? The potential importance of delegate attitudes in respect to the United Nations will be treated in detail later in the paper. Here, suffice it to say that delegates make decisions, relay information, give advice, and engage in other types of activities which allow them to help shape the institutions in which they operate. Because this is the case, it is assumed that the discovery of attitudinal patterns and the relationship of these patterns to various other indices is a potentially fruitful line of inquiry, which may facilitate an understanding of, and provide a basis for predictions about, the political processes of the United Nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent, Jack E., 1968. "National Attributes as Predictors of Delegate Attitudes at the United Nations1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(3), pages 916-931, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:62:y:1968:i:03:p:916-931_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400203201/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:62:y:1968:i:03:p:916-931_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.